Another Suspect In Massive Minnesota Food Fraud Probe Sentenced

A Lakeville man was sentenced Wednesday in federal court to one year of probation for his involvement in the massive Feeding Our Future fraud investigation.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel sentenced Khadar Adan, who pleaded guilty in August to one count of theft of government property, for allowing a fraudulent food distribution site to operate out of his Minneapolis business center, JigJiga.

Adan admitted to accepting $1,000 in illicit proceeds and was ordered to pay the same amount in restitution, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported.

Adan was the last of three defendants tied to the Lake Street Kitchen scheme housed within JigJiga to plead guilty.

The $250 million Feeding Our Future case — centered on a St. Anthony nonprofit — is the largest pandemic-era fraud prosecution in the United States. Of the 75 people charged, 50 have entered guilty pleas. Prosecutors say the defendants falsely claimed to have provided millions of meals to children during the COVID-19 pandemic, instead diverting federal reimbursements to purchase luxury cars, real estate, and other high-end goods.According to court records, Adan and his co-defendants claimed to have served 70,000 meals between December 2020 and April 2021 through Lake Street Kitchen, receiving “significant funds” in return. Federal prosecutors said only a small fraction of those meals were actually distributed.

Co-defendant Liban Yasin Alishire, who co-operated Lake Street Kitchen and another site, Community Enhancement Services, received more than $1.6 million and pleaded guilty in 2023.

Meanwhile, a former campaign associate of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) pleaded guilty last month to participating in the same scam, adding another chapter to the growing list of controversies surrounding the progressive lawmaker’s political orbit.

Federal prosecutors announced that 49-year-old Guhaad Hashi Said — described by Alpha News as an “enforcer” for Omar’s campaign — admitted in court to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. The charges stem from a wide-ranging fraud targeting a federally funded child nutrition program during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The conviction many in the Feeding Our Future case is yet another reminder of the vast reach of this fraud and the scale of the crisis we face in Minnesota,” Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson said in a statement. “These crimes are not isolated events. They are part of a web of schemes targeting programs that are intended to lift up Minnesotans and bleeding them dry.

“From where I sit, the scale of the fraud in Minnesota is staggering, and every rock we turn over reveals more. We must be honest and clear-eyed about the scope of this problem, because ending it will take an unyielding, all-hands-on-deck effort from all of us,” Thompson added.

According to court documents, between December 2020 and January 2022, Said exploited the Federal Child Nutrition Program, falsely claiming his nonprofit — Advance Youth Athletic Development — was serving thousands of meals daily to underprivileged children. Incorporated in February 2021, the organization was registered to a residential apartment in the Central Avenue Lofts in Minneapolis.

Beginning in March 2021, Said submitted meal count sheets claiming to have served 5,000 meals per day. From March through December of that year, he claimed to have served more than 1 million meals — but in reality provided only a fraction of that number. Prosecutors say he fabricated meal counts, attendance rosters, and invoices to secure reimbursements.

The scheme brought in roughly $2.9 million in federal funds. Between August and December 2021, Said transferred more than $2.1 million from his organization’s bank accounts to a catering business, ostensibly for food purchases, while using other proceeds to buy real estate, cars, and personal items through a network of shell nonprofits and LLCs, the DOJ said.

Said now faces up to 25 years in federal prison when sentenced. He previously ran for the Minnesota House of Representatives in 2018.

Shockwave in Congress: Adam Schiff STUNNED as All Nine Republican House Members Sign His Removal!

Adam Schiff Faces Unprecedented Pressure as All Nine Republican House Members Demand His Removal

In a stunning turn of events that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, all nine Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee have united in a bold declaration: Adam Schiff must resign from his position as chairman. This unprecedented move comes in the wake of accusations that Schiff has repeatedly promoted false narratives regarding the Trump campaign and its ties to Russia, undermining the integrity of the committee and eroding public trust in government institutions.

The Background: Schiff’s Controversial Tenure

Adam Schiff, a prominent figure in the Democratic Party and a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump, has long been at the center of the Russia investigation narrative. As chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Schiff has been instrumental in leading inquiries into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives during the 2016 election. However, his aggressive pursuit of this narrative has drawn fierce criticism from Republican lawmakers, who argue that his actions have not only been partisan but have also severely damaged the credibility of the committee he leads.

The recent letter signed by all nine Republican members of the committee outlines a scathing indictment of Schiff’s conduct. They accuse him of knowingly pushing false information, disregarding the findings of the special counsel, and abusing his position to promote a narrative that has been repeatedly debunked. This collective condemnation reflects a growing frustration among Republicans, who believe that Schiff’s behavior is incompatible with the responsibilities of his role.

The Charges: A Call for Accountability

The letter from the Republican members is a clear call for accountability. They assert that Schiff’s actions have compromised the integrity of the committee and undermined public faith in the U.S. government. “Your actions, both past and present, are incompatible with your duty as chairman of this committee,” the letter states. The Republicans argue that Schiff’s continued leadership poses a threat to effective oversight of the U.S. intelligence community, which is vital for national security.

Congressman Mike Conaway from Texas, who led the charge against Schiff, emphasized the gravity of the situation. He described Schiff’s obsession with the Russia narrative as crippling to the credibility of the intelligence committee. “We have no faith in your ability to discharge your duties in a manner consistent with your constitutional responsibility,” Conaway stated during the hearing. This sentiment resonates with many Republicans who see Schiff’s tenure as a damaging chapter in congressional history.

Schiff’s Defense: A Counterattack

In response to the mounting pressure, Schiff has defended his actions, arguing that the accusations against him are politically motivated attacks intended to distract from the real issues at hand. During the hearing, he pointed to the Trump Tower meeting involving Donald Trump Jr. and Russian operatives as evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the Trump campaign. Schiff contended that the meeting and the subsequent actions of the Trump campaign represent a serious compromise of American democracy.

However, Schiff’s defense has not resonated with Republican members, who view it as an attempt to deflect attention from the core issue: his alleged promotion of falsehoods. They argue that instead of addressing the specific accusations leveled against him, Schiff has chosen to rehash old claims, further alienating himself from his colleagues and the public.

The Implications: A Crisis of Confidence

The implications of this showdown extend far beyond Schiff’s personal reputation. If a chairman of a key congressional committee can knowingly promote falsehoods without facing consequences, what does that say about accountability in Washington? Republicans are making it clear that keeping Schiff in power not only damages trust in Congress but also weakens the institutions that underpin American democracy.

The pressure on Schiff is mounting, and the American people are watching closely. Polls indicate that public confidence in Congress is at an all-time low, and the perception of partisan gamesmanship only exacerbates this crisis. As Republicans push for Schiff’s resignation, they are framing the issue as one of integrity and accountability, appealing to a public that is increasingly frustrated with perceived corruption and dishonesty in politics.

The Future of Oversight in America

This confrontation marks a turning point in the ongoing battle for political oversight in America. The Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee have laid down the gauntlet, signaling that they will not tolerate what they view as reckless behavior from their colleagues. The outcome of this conflict could set a precedent for how Congress handles issues of oversight and accountability moving forward.

As the hearing unfolds and tensions rise, Schiff may refuse to step aside, but the mounting pressure from his Republican colleagues and the broader public could force him to reconsider his position. The stakes are high, and the ramifications of this showdown will likely reverberate throughout the political landscape for years to come.

Conclusion: A Divided Congress

The demand for Adam Schiff’s resignation underscores the deep divisions within Congress and the broader political landscape. As the two parties continue to clash over issues of integrity, accountability, and oversight, the American public remains caught in the crossfire. The outcome of this conflict will not only impact Schiff’s future but also shape the direction of political discourse in the United States.

As this situation develops, it is essential for citizens to stay informed and engaged. The fight for accountability in Washington is far from over, and the implications of this showdown will undoubtedly influence the future of American politics. Should Adam Schiff resign? The question lingers in the air, inviting opinions and discussions among the public as the political landscape continues to evolve.