Ilhan Omar REMOVED From Congress After Verbal THREAT Said To Trump’s Family
Escalation and Denaturalization Threats: The Volatile Campaign Against Ilhan Omar
The political feud surrounding Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has intensified dramatically, fueled by renewed calls from conservative figures, including former President
This latest surge in controversy was sparked by a video where Omar reportedly expressed deep feelings for her ancestral home (13:18–13:23), which critics interpreted as a stark expression of disloyalty to the United States. The situation is further inflamed by aggressive public statements, the resurfacing of long-debunked allegations of financial fraud, and unverified claims of election manipulation, all framed by the conservative media as evidence that Omar is fundamentally unfit to serve in Congress.
The Central Demand: “Go Back to Somalia”
The core catalyst for the current storm is the continued insistence by Donald Trump and his allies that Ilhan Omar, a naturalized U.S. citizen and Congresswoman, should
Trump’s Stance: The former President has repeatedly made this demand, an action which her supporters condemn as racist and xenophobic, but which her critics see as a necessary response to her perceived anti-American rhetoric.
Legislative Threat: This political rhetoric has been translated into a stated legislative goal. Florida Representative Randy Fine (R-FL), a staunch Trump ally, was quoted as saying, “My goal is to not give you a choice”
The host echoed this sentiment forcefully throughout the segment, repeatedly telling Omar to leave if she finds fault with America: “Bro, go, bro. I truly promise you… you are free to go”
Allegations of Astronomical Financial Fraud
A significant portion of the recent scrutiny has focused on the financial disclosures of Omar and her husband, Tim Mynett, alleging an unprecedented and suspicious surge in their net worth.
The $30 Million Claim
Citing reports, the host detailed that Omar’s net worth allegedly soared to a range between $6 million and $30 million, a purported 3,500% increase
This disclosure stands in stark contrast to Omar’s own public statements made earlier this year (c. February 2025 in the clip timeline), where she explicitly denied being a millionaire:
Omar’s Earlier Denial: “My salary is $174,000 before taxes. I don’t have stock or own a home, and I’m still paying off my student debt… I barely have thousands, let alone millions.”
(3:02–3:18)
Omar attempted to refute the millionaire claims by pointing to the complexity of the financial disclosure documents, arguing that the reported asset ranges did not equate to liquid income (1:22–1:43). However, critics dismissed her defense as insufficient, viewing the financial leap as evidence of potential corruption and illicit gain, particularly given her prominent political role (3:46–3:53).
Unverified Claims of Election Fraud and Ballot Harvesting
The final, and most explosive, set of claims focused on alleged voter fraud schemes in Minnesota’s Somali community purportedly linked to Omar’s allies.
Project Veritas Investigation
The host referenced an investigative video from the conservative activist group Project Veritas (6:05–6:32), which claimed to have exposed “alleged ballot harvesting by supporters of Democrat Representative Ilhan Omar and her allies in Minnesota”
The Allegation: The video allegedly showed an operative bragging about illegally collecting “hundreds of ballots” from elderly Somali immigrants and claiming that individuals linked to Omar’s campaign pay money to the voters (6:28–7:02).
Legal Context: The report notes that while the amount of ballots allegedly collected was illegal under Minnesota law (which allowed a person to submit ballots for only up to three others), a temporary court order related to the primary election had, at one time, lifted that limit (8:53–9:05).
Calls for Action: The host stressed that while the county attorney stated that “ballot harvesting” is illegal and is being investigated, more “action” is needed (9:41–9:47). This claim is consistent with other reports that have raised concerns about voter fraud in the Somali-American community in Minnesota, though conclusive evidence tying it directly to Omar has historically been lacking or challenged.
Conclusion: Politics of Loyalty and Identity
The campaign to remove Ilhan Omar from Congress and potentially strip her of citizenship is driven by a deep ideological conflict and supported by a cascade of serious but often unverified allegations.
For her critics, Omar’s political dissent, combined with her cultural background and the unproven claims of financial and electoral fraud, confirms a belief that she is fundamentally an internal threat. The repeated demand for her to “go back” is a clear expression that they view her as an outsider whose loyalties lie elsewhere.
Conversely, Omar and her defenders view these continuous, aggressive attacks—which often rely on xenophobic and Islamophobic tropes (10:07–10:13)—as an assault on her identity and an attempt to silence a powerful progressive voice of color through denaturalization threats and endless investigation.
This controversy highlights the severe polarization in U.S. politics, where political disagreement is often elevated to questions of fundamental loyalty and citizenship, creating a highly volatile environment for elected officials like Ilhan Omar.
.
Elderly Democratic Rep Falls On House Floor Protesting ‘BBB’
Elderly Democratic Congresswoman Falls on House Floor While Protesting Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’-An 81-year-old Democratic lawmaker suffered a misstep on the House floor Thursday while protesting President Donald Trump’s sweeping new tax package — legislation he has dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” but which opponents have branded the “big, ugly bill.”
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), a fixture of Illinois politics since the 1990s, reportedly stumbled during a heated floor debate as she pressed her party’s case against the measure. The incident unfolded against the backdrop of frenetic negotiations in Washington, with Republicans determined to meet Trump’s July 4 deadline for passage.
Schakowsky had been reiterating Democrats’ chief criticism: that the legislation prioritizes the wealthy while jeopardizing healthcare access for millions. Just a day earlier, she had shared a fiery message on social media. “I’m not just a no on Trump’s Big Ugly Bill, I’m a HELL NO!” she declared on X, calling the legislation “a crime scene” designed to enrich the nation’s wealthiest citizens at the expense of working families.
Jeffries Takes the Floor
Her comments set the stage for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who launched into an extended filibuster under the House’s “magic minute” rule — which allows members to speak for unlimited time so long as they remain standing. Surrounded by stacks of binders filled with prepared remarks, Jeffries delivered a lengthy address that stretched across the afternoon and evening, underscoring Democratic frustration over the bill’s rapid push toward passage.
Age and Politics Under Scrutiny
Schakowsky’s stumble, while minor, drew fresh attention to a broader issue hovering over Washington: the advanced age of many of its most powerful figures. The question of whether octogenarians should continue serving in high-pressure roles has dominated headlines in recent months, following President Joe Biden’s faltering debate performance earlier this year and his subsequent decision to withdraw from the 2024 race.
For critics, the incident served as another reminder of the generational divide shaping American politics. Schakowsky, who announced she would not seek reelection in 2026, has served in the House since 1999 after seven years in the Illinois state legislature. Though she remains an outspoken progressive voice, her fall on the House floor has added to mounting unease about the physical and cognitive demands placed on elderly lawmakers.
A Narrow Victory for Trump
Despite Democratic resistance, Trump’s tax bill cleared the House in a razor-thin 218-214 vote, marking one of the president’s most significant legislative wins since returning to the White House. The “One Big Beautiful Bill,” as Republicans celebrated it, extends the individual tax cuts first introduced in Trump’s 2017 overhaul and eliminates taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits for seniors.
It also includes sweeping changes to Medicaid, tightening eligibility in a move projected to reduce spending by $1 trillion over the next decade. Unauthorized immigrants and others deemed ineligible will be excluded under the new criteria.
Perhaps most notably, the bill allocates $46.5 billion toward completing a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border — a campaign promise dating back to 2016 that went unfulfilled during Trump’s first term.
Political Fallout
For Trump and his allies, the vote represents a defining moment. “Campaigns are filled with promises and most administrations are filled with excuses, but not @POTUS,” former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows wrote on X. “Once again, he has fulfilled his commitments to the American people.”
For Democrats, however, the bruising defeat highlights both their internal divisions and the difficulty of countering Trump’s second-term momentum. With six months gone, the president has already achieved the bulk of his campaign pledges, reshaping the fiscal and political landscape for the remainder of his presidency.
As for Schakowsky, she returned to her seat shortly after her fall and continued participating in the debate. Yet the image of the elderly congresswoman stumbling as she fought to oppose Trump’s bill may linger in the public imagination — a symbolic moment
