MUST SEE: Kamala Harris Admits the Biden White House Should Have…

Former Vice President Kamala Harris has just admitted what conservatives have known for years — Joe Biden’s presidency was never about progress or innovation, but about protecting Democrat donors and union bosses. Her rare public criticism of Biden over his 2021 decision to exclude Elon Musk from a White House electric vehicle event is a stunning confession that exposes the corruption, arrogance, and anti-American priorities of the left.

 

Speaking at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit in Washington, D.C., Harris said it was a “big mistake” not to invite Musk, the man who revolutionized the electric vehicle industry and helped put America back on top of the global innovation map.

“I thought it was a big mistake to not invite Elon Musk when we did a big EV event,” Harris said. “Here he is, the major American manufacturer of extraordinary innovation in this space.”

Her statement, while long overdue, is a complete vindication for conservatives who have repeatedly warned that Biden’s administration operates on political favoritism, not merit. When the White House held its EV summit in 2021, executives from General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis were invited — but not Musk. The reason? Tesla wasn’t unionized.

That’s right — the Biden administration deliberately excluded the most successful American EV manufacturer because Elon Musk refused to bow down to Big Labor. Then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki tried to spin it by saying the event was limited to “the three largest employers of the United Auto Workers,” a clear admission that political loyalty, not innovation, determined who got a seat at the table.

When asked if Tesla’s exclusion was punishment for being non-union, Psaki smugly said, “I’ll let you draw your own conclusion.” Millions of Americans did — and they concluded that Biden’s “Build Back Better” agenda was nothing more than a political slush fund for Democrat allies.

Musk, who sold more electric cars than Ford, GM, and Chrysler combined, tweeted, “Yeah, seems odd that Tesla wasn’t invited.” The post went viral, and Americans saw right through the charade — Biden was rewarding his union cronies while punishing the most innovative entrepreneur of our time.

Kamala Harris’s recent comments confirm what conservatives like President Donald J. Trump had been saying: the left doesn’t care about progress unless they can control it.

“So, I thought that was a mistake,” Harris added. “I don’t know Elon Musk, but I have to assume that that was something that hit him hard and had an impact on his perspective.”

It did more than that — it changed the course of American politics. Musk, once politically independent, began to see through the hypocrisy of the left and eventually became one of President Trump’s strongest backers. By 2024, Musk had contributed nearly $300 million to Republican-aligned groups through 

America PAC, helping fuel the America First movement and pushing back against the radical left’s war on capitalism.

According to sources close to Musk, his decision to back Trump wasn’t about politics — it was about protecting innovation, freedom, and meritocracy from the grip of bureaucrats and union puppets.

Biden, meanwhile, poured salt in the wound by crediting GM’s Mary Barra with having “electrified the entire automobile industry.” The claim was laughable — Tesla had already dominated the EV market for years. That single statement reportedly “infuriated” Musk, and rightly so.

Even when Biden’s team tried to patch things up by arranging private calls with Musk, it was too late. The damage was done, and the message was clear: if you don’t play by the left’s rules, you get punished.

The Tesla snub became a defining symbol of everything wrong with the Biden administration — a regime obsessed with identity politics, union loyalty, and virtue signaling rather than achievement and results.

Harris’s admission, whether intentional or not, is a damning indictment of the very administration she helped lead. She’s now promoting her memoir, 107 Days, where she calls Biden’s re-election campaign “reckless” and criticizes his misplaced priorities. It’s clear that even Democrats are jumping ship as the Biden legacy continues to sink.

“When we made the decision as an administration to put the infrastructure bill and the CHIPS Act first, I actually think that was a mistake,” Harris confessed during the event.

The former vice president’s sudden honesty reveals a fractured Democratic Party, divided between those trying to salvage their reputations and those doubling down on failed policies.

Conservatives, however, see this as proof that President Trump’s America First vision was right all along. “President Trump has always prioritized results over politics,” said a senior White House official. “Unlike Biden, he celebrates those who actually innovate, create jobs, and make America strong again.”

Harris’s comments also highlight a growing realization among former Democrats that the left’s obsession with “wokeness” and union loyalty has driven away some of the country’s brightest minds. Elon Musk himself warned in 2023 that the “woke mind virus” was destroying innovation and free thought.

And now, even Kamala Harris seems to agree — though she’ll never admit it outright.

Her admission that Biden’s policies alienated Musk — and helped push him into Trump’s camp — shows how badly the Democrats miscalculated. What they saw as a political victory for unions became a rallying cry for conservatives.

 

Musk’s support for Trump’s reelection was not just financial — it was symbolic of the growing coalition of innovators, small business owners, and independent thinkers who are rejecting the left’s suffocating control.

Trump himself praised Musk earlier this year, saying, “Elon is a true American innovator. He builds things. He creates jobs. He represents the future that the radical left wants to destroy.”

BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…

Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.

 

Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.

She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.

“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”

These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.

The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.

“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”

Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.

For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.

Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.

What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.

In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.

Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.

Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.

Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.

This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.

 

Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.

The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.

BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…

 

Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.

Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.

 

“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.

The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.

According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.

Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.

“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.

Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.

AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”

 

Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.

“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.

Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.

Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.

House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.

“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.

Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.

But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.

 

“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.

Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.

“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.

Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.

Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.

Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.

“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”

BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..

It’s finally happening.

John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.

Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.

 

Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.

Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.

Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.

Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.

CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”

“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”

 

Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.

James Comey, for his part, did the same.

The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.

The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.

These two didn’t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.

Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence” used in the Russia assessment.

But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report’s credibility.

It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.

“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.

“They all knew what they were doing.”

Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.

“Jasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,” Leavitt challenged.

“She’ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers—all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.”

And for what? To push Hillary Clinton’s opposition research as gospel truth.

Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.

Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.

Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: “If Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted—no exceptions, no excuses.”

This scandal is bigger than Watergate.

It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.

The investigations are underway.

 

Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?

Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.

No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.

BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That…

Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.

 

“I made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,” Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.

According to the New York Post, Biden’s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.

 

The New York Post confirmed, “Biden admitted that he didn’t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.”

The same report added, “The autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.”

While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made “every decision,” he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, “I approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.”

 

The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: “That is utter BS,” he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.

Still, Biden’s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.

Time added context, noting, “Emails show Biden’s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president’s behalf.”

In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: “While it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.”

Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden’s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, “This isn’t just about a signature. It’s about tansparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.”

Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, “We are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden’s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.”

The legal debate over autopen use isn’t new, but Biden’s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, “It has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.”

 

Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, “It feeds the narrative that Biden isn’t all there.”

The same strategist added, “If he wasn’t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?”

In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, “Each recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.”

This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with “speed and secrecy,” raising transparency questions.

Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: “He didn’t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,” he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.

Trump added, “You don’t get to hide behind a machine when you’re playing with the law.”